December-January patterns – better alternatives for casuals

Posted December 12, 2009 by sewingplums
Categories: my choices

Isn’t it interesting that we can like one pattern more than another, even when they’re very similar ? Sometimes I have difficulty pinning down why that is, but it’s definitely true with some of the patterns in this month’s Sew Today (December – January issue of UK BMV magazine).

– – –

Note : Butterick-McCall’s-Vogue has changed their websites. My links now only get you to a page where you can search for a pattern number.
I apologise that I haven’t changed to the new individual URLs, but it would be a lot of work.

– – –

If I was still working I would be interested in the Vogue 1141 wardrobe, a Soft Classic look. I’m not a suit person, and luckily I’m retired so finding one I like is not a problem. But it is a relief to know there’s a pattern I wouldn’t mind wearing if I had to. I might omit the pocket flaps on the jacket – their present position is not ideal for someone with high hips !

”softsuita2”

For an intermediate weight jacket, there’s Butterick 5424. I like cape collars, and this has an interesting and rare feature for a reversible jacket : a fitted waist shape.

”reversiblejkt”

This is similar to Marcy Tilton’s Vogue 8600 which I’ve mentioned before. The Butterick looks easier to make.

”tiltonjkt”

As an outermost layer there is an old favourite of mine, the jacket from Vogue Woman 8526. A lovely padded coat for cold weather, and that big collar makes a hood. Oddly it doesn’t have a closure. Easy enough to add button loops in the front edge seam.

”vwjkt”

What about leisure wear ? Butterick 5409 in the magazine is a current cardigan look, especially view B. But there are several versions of this cut-off sleeve look which I prefer. My favourites are Butterick 5251 (above) or McCall’s 5932 (below), and they have interesting extra choices.

”cardigans”

Connie Crawford’s new sleep wear Butterick 5434 (smock insert top and loose pants) is the sort of easy style I like. But there are other Butterick patterns with an inset yoke and more flair. For a tunic version my favourite is Butterick 4856. Gathers aren’t right for every body but they are good on me. I need to add some flare at the sides.

”insettunic”

For an open fronted version of this style, my all-time favourite is Christine Johnson’s Inset Jacket 115 for wovens. Though I would add a button band.

”cjinsetjkt”

It’s obvious from the magazine photo that the Connie Crawford Butterick 5434 pants have too short crotch extensions for the model. The strain lines don’t appear so clearly in this scan, especially the ones in shadow on the left (her right) inside leg. Poor girl – not the most comfortable pyjama bottoms. RTW pants often have short crotch extensions, as they ‘waste’ fabric. Happily we don’t have to put up with that when we make pants ourselves.

”crotchext”

I have a large number of elastic waist pant patterns – get one as a free gift every time I buy a top pattern. For slopping around I don’t suppose there’s much to choose between the wide-leg versions. Slim ones are more of a problem. Around here many young people are wearing pants slim enough to fit inside calf-length fur boots (the look is so important to them they were wearing fur boots even in a warm spell !) But I’m still looking for a slim pant pattern for myself. I’m not sure it’s possible to slim down that far from my hips, but I am searching !

Although elastic waist pants aren’t ideal for my shape, I’m starting my slow search for TNT pants by making elastic waists for simplicity. I’m currently trying Butterick 5044 (left), for one-seam straight leg pants which are well reviewed at PR. Then McCall’s 5889 (centre) for slimmer ones with side seams (much better for my curved hips and saddle bags). Before perhaps moving on to Marcy Tilton’s Vogue 8499 (right) to see if those pockets make my hips look like weapons of war . . .

”3pants2”

There are many other patterns in this Sew Today issue that I like, but I’ve already mentioned them in other plans !

To make a wardrobe from this selection, I would need to add a blouse. But otherwise it does make a lovely group of warm winter layers 😀

Patterns available December 09

The perfect shirt ?

Posted December 3, 2009 by sewingplums
Categories: my choices, pattern making for clothes, personal style

Style is not just in the major choices, such as whether to have a straight or a gathered sleeve, but also the details. All the possible style adjustments in pattern making software gave me this ‘aha’ moment.

– – –

Which immediately reminded me of two patterns I’m intrigued by : they’re both shirts yet they’re so different. The differences need an eagle eye for detail, a way of looking at patterns that I’m not used to. Perhaps that’s part of why I’m not a top clothes designer 😀 I found it very interesting to look slowly and carefully at these patterns.

”photos”

Left oop Vogue 2972 by Alice + Olivia.
Right McCall’s 5433 by Palmer-Pletsch.

In picking out these two shirt patterns, I’ve already made several major shirt styling decisions :
– I look better in fitted armhole styles, I don’t look so good in dropped shoulders.
– Although a yoke is a classic feature of a man’s shirt, and looks good on me, neither of these has a yoke. Yokes are difficult to fit on my sloping shoulders, but a yoke gives my shoulders more definition, which helps me as I don’t like shoulder pads.
– Some people say a style only counts as a shirt if it has no darts, and neither of these patterns passes that test either !

I prefer the shirt on the left, but I’m sure many people like the one on the right – it’s softer and more relaxed in effect, and more suited to the full busted. No pockets in the wrong place ! and the vertical lines of waist darts can have a slimming effect.

The left style has :
– crispness of fabric.
– visible ‘button’ detail
– this detail appears on the placket whether it is open or closed. (This is done by using poppas rather than buttons.)
– 3/4 sleeve (this sleeve is also a bit shorter than the 3/4 sleeve in the right hand pattern).
– neck opening worn up even though unbuttoned – that could be because of crisper fabric, or the way the placket is constructed, or the use of interfacing in the front band.
– deeper collar
– bust pockets
– shoulder point is at outer corner of shoulder, not above arm articulation point

Here are the line diagrams for the fronts :

”fronts”

(The size of one of the diagrams had to be changed. I’ve got them to the right relative proportions as far as I can.)
The line diagrams show there are differences in :
– collar point angle
– number of buttons, and button spacing
– depth of side slits
– possibly different angle of bust darts, related to possible differences of armhole depth.

The back drawings are :

”backs”

Personally I get better armhole fit with back shoulder darts, so I might add them to these patterns.

Both have double button detail on the sleeve cuff, though the buttons are placed differently. Sleeve placket type not clear from these drawings, but there are several options.

The left pattern has an underarm sleeve seam, while the right pattern has the sleeve seam moved to the back so the placket is easier to make.

These two shirts don’t include several other shirt style choices such as : different collar / cuff / sleeve widths, different front and sleeve plackets, different yoke shapes.

– – –

So even something that looks as obvious as a basic shirt actually involves many detailed style decisions. No wonder we’re willing to buy patterns, to pay someone else to choose all the details that ‘look right’ to our individual taste. To use pattern making software to make something equally satisfactory, I would have to be aware of all these details and how they affect the look of the final garment. And I haven’t naturally got that sort of awareness. I expect I could learn a bit about it, but it wouldn’t ever ‘come naturally’.

Perhaps my ideal shirt pattern is a combination of these two patterns, details of styling from the Vogue pattern, combined with added waist darts, and shoulder darts or yoke. Perhaps it would be better if I looked for a different pattern altogether, some sort of ‘shirt-blouse’ . . . There are multiple possible patterns for a basic blouse with set in sleeves, wrist cuffs, waist darts, and either convertible (very easy) or band (easy) collar. I think I’ll choose between them just on how I react visually without detailed analysis – though of course the eye can be tricked by the style and quality of the illustrations, the fabric used. . .

Patterns available December 09

Pattern making software, armhole depth

Posted November 28, 2009 by sewingplums
Categories: pattern making for clothes

One thing I’ve found is that I haven’t got an average distribution of upper body length above and below my armhole.

I’ve been checking pattern making software for which versions include this in their basic measurements. As far as I can discover from web sites and demos :

Yes, this software includes armhole depth in the basic measurements :

Bernina My Label

Dress Shop

Garment Designer (link on left in menu along top)

My Pattern Designer

No, does not include armhole depth in the basic measurements :

Pattern Maker

Pattern Master from Wild Ginger.

– – –

All except Garment Designer are for PC only, not for Mac.

Armhole depth is just one detail among the many ways they differ, and it won’t matter for most people. Software differs in the measurements and styles included, the way styles are chosen, and how design changes are made. If you’re interested, have a thorough check of information and demos as they really are very different.

Also some people find they don’t enjoy sticking computer printer paper together to get a pattern.

If you want to try this, you could download a free pattern from : BurdaStyle

Or there are a couple of ways to include some of your own measurements :

Pattern Maker based software CD in a book : Marie Clayton Make your own clothes.

Click and Sew selections from Pattern Master on CD from Wild Ginger.

(Again, I’m just saying these are available, not how good they are !)

– – –

Some people are enthusiastic about pattern making software. Some use it a few times and then go back to conventional patterns. Others do not get on with it at all. For me the problems are :
– although I put in a great deal of effort, I never managed to get it to fit me.
– I’m a physical person, I like to see what is happening in front of me, in paper shapes, scissors, pens, rulers, not hidden away out of sight.
– I’m not a designer. I can look at a pattern drawing and decide whether or not I like it. But all those little details that distinguish a pattern I like from one I don’t – those I can’t think of for myself. So I don’t like designs I get from my own decisions using software as much as the designs I get from a commercial pattern. Or perhaps I could make decisions about a design by looking at and changing a trial muslin in front of me, rather than by deciding in the abstract that I want a cuff to be 3 inches rather than 3-1/4 inches deep. . .

Tip 1 : if you have problems with fit, make a fitting sloper by conventional methods, and then try to get the software pattern to match your fitting sloper (that’s how I found the software I was using was impossible for me).
Tip 2 : it may be necessary to put measurements into the software which are not exactly your measurements, to get the software to produce something that fits.

– – –

P.S. Oh dear, I’d forgotten that ‘pattern making’ means something very different to software engineers ! If you follow up the suggestions automatically made by WordPress, you’ll end up in some unexpected places. . .

My ideal SWAP wardrobe ?

Posted November 21, 2009 by sewingplums
Categories: my choices, wardrobe planning

The rules for the Sewing With A Plan 2010 contest at Artisans Square are available. The idea is to make a wardrobe of co-ordinating pieces.

I don’t do well under pressure so won’t be taking part, but I love making plans so I’ve already made several 😀 I admire people who make one plan and stick to it, but my mind just doesn’t work that way !

There are 3 options this year. Two include dresses, which don’t fit my lifestyle. So I choose Option No. 1 :
6 tops  – t-shirts, shirts, blouses, or camisoles
4 bottoms – jeans, pants, shorts, skirts or kilts.
1 your choice (not an accessory)

This isn’t an ideal basis for my wardrobe, as I wear multiple layers. But this is just a fun plan anyway, so that doesn’t matter.

– – –

Note : Butterick-McCall’s-Vogue has changed their websites. My BMV links now only get you to a page where you can search for a pattern number.
I apologise that I haven’t changed to the new individual URLs, but it would be a lot of work.

– – –

6 tops :

When I let ideas spring to mind, I was surprised to realise my choices for tops are all Sewing Workshop patterns. Perhaps it’s not so surprising. They’re independent designers with a good selection of ‘pear shaped’ styles : flared sides with fitted shoulders. Rather than straight up and down styles with dropped shoulders, which are not flattering on me, and which most independent designers focus on.

Despite that, my first choice is a modern ‘sloppy joe’, the Hudson top. I think this works because it’s oversized. Straight sided patterns look bad on me because I need 2 to 3 sizes too large on the top to get fit over my hips – not surprising they look awful. . . On an oversized top like the Hudson, the side seams are somewhere out by the wearer’s elbows, which has a different effect.

I think this is modern because the armholes are high and the sleeves slim. Not like similar styles of 20 years ago which had such deep armholes they were like dolman sleeves – not flattering on me.

”hudson”

In their latest newsletter (link below), Palmer-Pletsch recommend short tops with wide pants, or long tops with slim pants. So presumably they would prefer the shorter top with these pants. Personally I look better in longer tops and in slimmer pants, and would be unlikely to use this pant style.

Perhaps that top is easy to make rather than ideal for me. For a more flattering shape, I need good fit at shoulders and flare over hips. Here are a couple of Sewing Workshop possibilities :

Spring Street : (oop) an attractive shirt with unusual collar. Though in the pattern the shoulders are more dropped and the sides less flared than they look in the line diagram. This is a rare case where the fashion drawing is closer to the style than the diagram is.

”springst”

Zigzag : has a front yoke. Perhaps it’s the recent version of the Spring Street shape, with changed collar and sleeves.

”zigzag”

Zona : has interesting seam and dart placements. It isn’t flared, so I would add some, probably at the underam.

Another pattern which meets my criteria is the Liberty shirt. And it has my favourite high collar. But I can’t include everything !

These tops would be good for me as they can also be worn as layering pieces – a way round the SWAP rules if you need warmth.

Inspired by the What did you wear today ? strand at Stitchers Guild, I really do need fitted tops as they are more flattering for me. I think I might be willing to post a photo of myself wearing something fitted, though not wearing my usual shapeless RTW. But oh fitted garments do need so much trouble with fitting ! Still, I would like to have these 2 patterns as TNTs, so. . .

Tribeca : I love this style – reminds me of a blouse I happily wore to rags. Sad to say, I gave up on my first attempt to get all those darts to fit my small busted, short waisted, high hipped, sloping shouldered, forward necked self, but one day. . .

”tribeca”

Salsa : another attractive style which would also need a lot of careful fitting on me.

”salsa”

All these tops have raised necklines, which suit my longish neck.

– – –

4 Bottoms :

I just wear pants as neutral background for tops. The Zigzag and Mizono (below) patterns include slim pants, so if they work well they could be a good basis. As I’ve chosen tops which cover the waist, the unflattering effect of an elastic waist on me would not matter so much.

Co-ordination : It isn’t necessary in the SWAP this year for all tops to go with all bottoms, but they are supposed make a ‘collection’. If the pants are all similar, that would ‘just’ be a matter of fabric choice. I’m cheating by not mentioning fabrics, as many people find this the most difficult part of making a co-ordinated wardrobe.

– – –

Optional item :

This would have to be a layering piece, to give me some warmth. To meet the rules, I’m only allowed one jacket, but four come to mind. There are recent Koos Vogue 1146 or Mizono Vogue 1145 patterns.

”koossmock”

”mizonocoatpant”

I love the snuggle look of the Mizono style, but it’s tapered at the sides, oh dear – well it’s big so perhaps it would be okay.

I also love the scarfed swing coat style. There’s DKNY Vogue 1129, said to be Easy but actually needing fitting skills. Ultimately I do need to do that fitting work, as I would like to wear a fitted coat instead of my big straight parkas. And fitted RTW just looks ridiculous on me.

”dknyscarf”

Or for a much easier scarf jacket there’s McCall’s 5987.

”scarfjkt”

Co-ordination – a layering piece has to work over all the outfits made from tops and bottoms. I don’t think the Koos jacket would work well with the necklines of the tops I’ve chosen, but the others would. I think the Mizono all enveloping jacket with big shawl collar would be a good choice from that point of view.

If I make the most sensible choice, it’s the McCall’s scarf jacket. But if I choose by love, it’s the snuggley Mizono or eventually the DKNY fitted one !

(P.S. Oh dear, Palmer-Pletsch in their latest newsletter recommend this DKNY scarf jacket for the inverted triangle shape. As I’m a pear, perhaps I need to re-think that one 😀 )

– – –

There are some subsidiary rules for the SWAP this year, to test sewing skills.

1 [garment] will be a matched print or stripe.
1 will feature embroidery, beads or sashiko.
1 will have buttons as the star feature OR use unusual or alternative closure(s).

Matched Stripes :

It would be fun to make the Zona top with matched chevron stripes ! Each piece would have to be cut individually – start from one of the fronts and work round. Use a pattern with seam allowances removed, as it’s essential to match sewing lines not cutting ones. But it would probably be impossible to end up with stripes matching at the front, so this isn’t really a good idea. . . It might work by shifting the front opening sideways so the stripes at the edge of the opening match the other side when the front is closed. And it would need the side seams changed to vertical.

Or I could use the Stripes Alive shirt from Brensan Studios. Ah, that wouldn’t be valid. For the SWAP you’re supposed to show your skill by matching stripes, and the whole point of that pattern is you don’t have to match stripes at all 😀

Embellishment :

The obvious choice to embellish is the Koos jacket. It’s designed to add embroidery to. Or the yoke could be made with sashiko. But otherwise that pattern doesn’t fit well with this plan.

The yoke of the Zigzag top would also be an easy place to add embroidery, beading, or sashiko. Or the seam and dart lines of the Zona top could be emphasised by added trim or embroidery.

Buttons :

I could use the Diane Ericson Revisions Nuevo shirt View B, instead of one of the other tops. Those dots on the shirt front are actually small buttons.

”nuevo2”

Or take inspiration from this John Galliano jacket covered in brooches 😀 (s/s 10 RTW)

”

Photo from Style.com. Patterns available November 2009